Maintenance guide

What is a planned maintenance system on a ship? ISM Code, class and practice

A planned maintenance system (PMS) on a ship is the register of every maintainable item on board, the maintenance and inspection jobs for each, and the records showing they were done. It is how a company meets section 10 of the ISM Code, and a class-approved PMS can replace the continuous machinery survey.

Written by the Synergetic compliance teamReviewed by Capt. Arjun Singh KalraLast updated 9 min read

What is a planned maintenance system on a ship?

A planned maintenance system is a structured way of deciding what maintenance each item of equipment needs, scheduling it, and recording what was actually done. On a modern merchant ship it is almost always software, with one database on board and a copy in the office.

A working PMS has four parts:

  • An equipment register: every maintainable item, from system down to component, with maker, model and serial number.
  • A job library: the inspection, testing and maintenance tasks for each item, with intervals and clear instructions.
  • Records: completed jobs, measurements, defects and repairs, signed by the responsible person.
  • Spares and stores: parts linked to the equipment they fit, with minimum stock levels.

IACS Recommendation 74, its guide to managing maintenance under the ISM Code, says a systematic approach "will begin with the establishment of a comprehensive asset register". Everything else in the system depends on that register being complete.

Does the ISM Code require a planned maintenance system?

The ISM Code does not use the words "planned maintenance system", but section 10, "Maintenance of the ship and equipment", sets out what one has to deliver. The company must:

  1. Establish procedures to keep the ship maintained in line with the relevant rules and regulations and any additional company requirements (10.1).
  2. Inspect at appropriate intervals, report any non-conformity with its possible cause, take corrective action and keep records (10.2).
  3. Identify critical equipment: equipment and technical systems "the sudden operational failure of which may result in hazardous situations", with specific measures to promote their reliability, including regular testing of stand-by arrangements and equipment not in continuous use (10.3).
  4. Integrate those inspections and measures into the ship's operational maintenance routine (10.4).

A PMS is the usual way to show all four to an auditor. IACS Recommendation 74 also links maintenance to other parts of the Code: the designated person (section 4), resources and personnel (section 6), non-conformities and accidents (section 9), document control (section 11) and the company's review of the SMS (section 12). It notes that more port state control detentions attributed to safety management failures have referred to maintenance than to any other clause of the ISM Code. See our ISM Code and SMS guide for the rest of the Code.

What is critical equipment under ISM Code 10.3?

Critical equipment is whatever the company identifies as equipment or systems whose sudden failure could cause a hazardous situation. The Code does not give a list; the company must make one for each ship type and trade.

IACS Recommendation 74 gives examples of stand-by and infrequently used equipment that should be inspected and tested under the maintenance plan:

CategoryExamples from IACS Rec. 74
Alarms and shutdownsAlarms and emergency shutdowns
System integrityFuel oil system, cargo system
Emergency equipmentEPIRB, portable VHF, emergency steering gear, emergency generator, emergency fire pump
Safety equipmentPortable gas detectors, CO2 detectors
Fire and life-savingFire-fighting and life-saving equipment
PowerGenerators and batteries
Pre-arrival and pre-departure testsSteering gear, main propulsion, telegraphs

In the PMS, critical equipment should be flagged so the office can see its status separately, with tests scheduled at defined intervals and overdue jobs escalated. An emergency generator and a galley fan should never look the same on a maintenance report.

How does a class-approved PMS replace continuous machinery survey?

Classification societies normally survey machinery under a Continuous Machinery Survey (CMS) scheme. Items are offered for survey in rotation so that the interval between examinations of each item does not exceed five years; Indian Register's guidelines say about one fifth of the items are examined each year.

IACS Unified Requirement Z20 allows an approved Planned Maintenance Scheme for machinery as an alternative to CMS. Survey is then based on the overhaul intervals in the PMS, using maker's recommendations, documented operator experience and condition monitoring where fitted. The main points of UR Z20 (Rev.1, July 2018) are:

UR Z20 pointWhat it means on board
ScopeLimited to components and systems covered by CMS; other items are surveyed in the usual way
IntervalsGenerally no longer than CMS intervals; longer running-hour intervals may be accepted if based on maker's recommendations
ResponsibilityThe Chief Engineer is the responsible person and signs overhaul documentation
SystemThe PMS is to be computerised, with back-ups and controlled access
ApprovalCertificate of approval (or equivalent notation) kept on board, confirmed by an implementation survey within one year
Annual auditClass surveyor reviews records and machinery condition, preferably with the annual machinery survey
Loss of approvalClass can cancel the arrangement if maintenance is not done, records are poor or overhaul intervals are exceeded
Change of managerSale, change of management or transfer of class means the approval is reconsidered

The last row matters to ship managers taking over a ship: a class-approved PMS does not transfer automatically with the vessel. IACS UR Z27 adds requirements for condition monitoring and condition-based maintenance schemes, which apply only to ships already on an approved PMS survey scheme.

Each class society applies these requirements through its own rules, so check your class society's procedure before applying.

What types of maintenance jobs go into a PMS?

A good job library mixes three kinds of trigger, chosen for each item:

  • Calendar jobs: fixed intervals such as weekly, monthly or annual. Used for safety equipment, stand-by machinery and anything that deteriorates with time rather than use.
  • Running-hour jobs: triggered by counters, for main and auxiliary engines, purifiers, compressors and pumps. They only work if counters are updated reliably.
  • Condition-based jobs: triggered by measurements such as vibration, lube oil analysis or temperature trends, where an approved condition monitoring scheme is in place.

IACS Recommendation 74 says intervals should be set from the maker's recommendations, condition monitoring where used, operating experience and failure history, how the equipment is used (continuous, intermittent, stand-by or emergency), what can only be done in dry dock, and class, convention, flag and company requirements. Record the reason whenever an interval departs from the maker's manual.

Some regulations now set their own expectations. Since 1 January 2026, SOLAS II-1/3-13 has required lifting appliances and loose gear to be inspected, tested and maintained to IMO guidelines, and those records may be kept in the PMS if they meet the conditions. We cover this in SOLAS II-1/3-13 lifting appliances: what your PMS needs.

What records does a planned maintenance system need to keep?

IACS Recommendation 74 divides maintenance records into two groups:

Externally generatedInternally generated
Class records, reports and certificatesRoutine shipboard inspections
Statutory records and certificatesMaintenance work carried out
Port state control reportsTesting of stand-by and critical equipment
Vetting reportsTesting of alarms and emergency shutdowns
Condition monitoring reportsSuperintendent visit reports, audits, non-conformities and corrective actions, spare part requests and deliveries

The same records serve as management information. Trend analysis of defects and repeat failures can justify changing an interval, or show a problem that needs a longer-term fix.

What are the benefits of a planned maintenance system?

The benefits of a planned maintenance system come from replacing memory and paper with one shared record:

  • Compliance evidence: ISM 10, class surveys, PSC and vetting inspections all ask for the same maintenance history.
  • Fewer failures: critical and stand-by equipment is tested before it is needed.
  • Survey efficiency: an approved PMS can be credited for class machinery survey.
  • Handover continuity: a relieving Chief Engineer sees what is due, overdue and deferred.
  • Office oversight: superintendents see the fleet's maintenance status without waiting for reports.
  • Better spending: spares and repairs are planned rather than urgent.

None of these benefits survives poor data. A PMS that shows every job in date while the equipment is not maintained as the maker intended is worse than no system, because it hides the risk.

How do you build or clean up a PMS database?

The database decides whether the PMS works. Most failures trace back to the first data load: missing equipment, intervals copied without review, no starting status, and parts not linked. A sound approach:

  1. Walk the ship and build the equipment list from what is installed, checked against drawings and class records.
  2. Standardise names and coding across the fleet so the office can compare ships.
  3. Review job intervals with the Chief Engineer and record any departure from the maker's manual.
  4. Set the starting status from evidence: last overhaul reports, running-hour counters and class records.
  5. Flag critical equipment in line with the SMS.
  6. Link spares and certificates before go-live.

Our team builds and cleans PMS databases as a service; see PMS database creation. For how to get the first data load right, see our article PMS database creation: get the first data load right.

Frequently asked questions

Is a planned maintenance system mandatory on ships?

Not by that name. The ISM Code requires procedures to keep the ship maintained, inspections at appropriate intervals, records, and specific measures for critical equipment. A planned maintenance system is the usual way to meet those requirements. Class societies separately offer approved PMS schemes, which a shipowner can choose instead of continuous machinery survey.

What is the difference between PMS and continuous machinery survey?

Under continuous machinery survey, class surveyors examine machinery items in rotation so each is seen within five years. Under an approved planned maintenance scheme, survey is based on the PMS overhaul intervals and records, with the Chief Engineer responsible and an annual class audit. IACS UR Z20 sets the common requirements for both societies and owners.

Who is responsible for the PMS on board?

The Chief Engineer is normally responsible for the planned maintenance system on board, and IACS UR Z20 names the Chief Engineer as the responsible person for a class-approved scheme. Deck equipment jobs are usually assigned to the Chief Officer. The company remains responsible under the ISM Code for procedures, resources and checking that maintenance is done.

What equipment counts as critical under the ISM Code?

Critical equipment is any equipment or technical system whose sudden failure could cause a hazardous situation, as identified by the company. The ISM Code gives no fixed list. IACS Recommendation 74 suggests examples such as emergency generators, steering gear, emergency fire pumps, alarms and shutdowns, fire-fighting and life-saving equipment.

Should PMS jobs follow running hours or calendar intervals?

Both, depending on the item. Running-hour jobs suit engines, purifiers, compressors and pumps that wear with use. Calendar jobs suit safety, stand-by and emergency equipment that deteriorates with time. Condition-based jobs can replace either where an approved monitoring scheme exists. Each interval should start from the maker's recommendation and be reviewed against experience.

Does a class-approved PMS stay valid after a change of manager?

Not automatically. IACS UR Z20 says the sale of a ship, a change of management or a transfer of class causes the PMS approval to be reconsidered. A new manager taking over a ship should contact the class society early and check that the equipment data, intervals and records meet the approved scheme.

What is the most common weakness in a ship's PMS?

Incomplete or inaccurate data. Equipment missing from the register, maker's intervals changed without a recorded reason, defects logged outside the PMS and no starting status all mean the system cannot prove what maintenance was done. Fixing the database usually does more for compliance than changing the software.

Sources

  1. IMO, International Safety Management (ISM) Code
  2. IACS Recommendation No. 74, A guide to managing maintenance in accordance with the requirements of the ISM Code (Rev.2, August 2018), copy hosted by Steamship Mutual
  3. IACS UR Z20, Planned Maintenance Scheme (PMS) for Machinery (Rev.1, July 2018), copy hosted by Türk Loydu
  4. IACS UR Z27, Condition Monitoring and Condition Based Maintenance (July 2018), copy hosted by Türk Loydu
  5. Indian Register of Shipping, Guidelines on Continuous Surveys of Machinery (March 2022)
  6. Liberian Registry, Marine Notice SAF-020 on SOLAS II-1/3-13 lifting appliances

Related